The New Earth · Chapter 07

Biodynamics, Hugo Erbe and radical field inquiry

Read the original traditions, then ask precise questions of the land.

49. The biodynamic farm as an organism

Living tradition / comparative system research

Biodynamics combines an ecological farming programme with preparations and a spiritual understanding of the farm. Reviews describe findings across soil, crops and biodiversity, alongside variation in study design. Whole-system comparisons cannot automatically isolate the effect of a preparation. An older USDA compost comparison reported no crop or soil differences after two years between prepared and ordinary compost treatments. The distinct research questions deserve separate treatment. [S41] [S42]

50. Steiner 500 and 501

Documented preparation tradition

Horn manure, BD 500, and horn silica, BD 501, are the principal biodynamic field sprays. Practitioners assign them different roles in soil–root and light–plant relationships. Traditional production uses bovine horns, and BD 500 uses manure. A vegan publication can explain the tradition accurately while pursuing plant-based fertility methods for its own practical growing work. Changing an ingredient creates a different treatment that needs its own account. [S40]

51. Compost preparations 502–507 and horsetail 508

Documented preparation tradition

The six compost preparations use yarrow, chamomile, nettle, oak bark, dandelion and valerian; traditional preparation methods can include animal materials. Horsetail is associated with BD 508 and has a separate place in practice. Read original instructions for what practitioners actually do. If testing an effect, compare equivalent compost feedstocks and maturity rather than attributing every difference between two composts to their preparations. [S40]

52. Hugo Erbe #5: Cow Stomach

Historical and practitioner research lead

Erbe’s numbering is a separate preparation system; #5 is not Steiner’s 505. JPI lists Cow Stomach #5 among its preparations, providing a direct lead into Erbe’s approach. Its animal-material basis matters for Soulful Table’s values. Explore the original text and maker’s explanation before interpreting the intended soil or compost role. A listed preparation establishes a living practice; its agronomic effects need their own research. [S45]

53. Hugo Erbe #8: Three Kings

Living spiritual-agricultural tradition

JPI publishes instructions for the Three Kings preparation, associated with gold, frankincense, myrrh and seasonal boundary work. It offers a vivid example of agriculture understood as ceremony and relationship. Describe the maker’s intentions as the maker’s account. A comparative farm study would still need a defined treatment, ordinary management controls and independently assessed outcomes to establish an agronomic effect. [S43]

54. Hugo Erbe #9: Harmonizing

Living spiritual-agricultural tradition

The Harmonizing preparation is described by JPI within Erbe’s approach to gratitude and the elemental world. Traditional descriptions include animal-derived ingredients, which should remain visible in a vegan discussion. Its meaning as a seasonal practice and its proposed effects on a crop are different subjects. We can explore the tradition respectfully and design a plant-based gratitude ritual without claiming it is the same preparation. [S44]

55. Agricultural radionics

Practitioner method / open efficacy question

Radionics practitioners describe working with witness samples, instrument settings and intention in relation to farms. Lutie Larsen’s agricultural course is a direct source for her method. This research collection does not establish independently replicated field evidence that a remote radionic broadcast improves crop nutrition, yield or pest control. A useful investigation would include concealed random assignment, a sham condition and independent harvest measurements. [S46]

56. Agrohomeopathy and high-dilution plant research

Research niche; field application uncertain

The University of Bern describes plant-based bioassays used in homeopathy research, including stressed plants and field models. This establishes a real research niche, rather than a proven general farming method. Study quality, reproducibility, contamination control and the transfer from an assay to a farm are central questions. Explore the actual papers and controls before turning a positive plant experiment into a crop recommendation. [S47]

Keep exploring

These field notes open the questions. Return to The New Earth’s growing article collection for deeper explorations as they are published.

Read The New Earth articles

Sources for this chapter

All eight chapters · Previous chapter · Next chapter

Download the complete field guide, including the worldwide atlas, field notebook and source directory.

Disclaimer

This guide is educational and exploratory. Research findings, cultural traditions and practitioner claims have different kinds and levels of support; their inclusion is not a guarantee of safety, effectiveness, nutritional superiority or environmental benefit. Agricultural interventions need appropriate local assessment, testing and legal compliance. Psychedelic substances carry medical and legal risks; discussion here is not advice to obtain, grow or use them, or a substitute for qualified care. Respect Indigenous authority, ecological limits and the wellbeing of people, animals and other living beings when putting any idea into practice.